Ariew, Andre (1996) Innateness and Canalization. [Conference Paper]
| ASCII 28Kb |
Abstract
Cognitive scientists often employ the notion of innateness without defining it. The issue is, how is innateness defined in biology? Some critics contend that innateness is not a legitimate concept in biology. In this paper I will argue that it is. However, neither the concept of high heritability nor the concept of flat norm of reaction (two popular accounts in the biology literature) define innateness. An adequate account is found in developmental biology. I propose that innateness is best defined in terms of C. H. Waddington's concept of canalization.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | innateness, canalization, Waddington, heritability, norms of reaction |
| Subjects: | Biology > Population Biology Philosophy > Philosophy of Science |
| ID Code: | 330 |
| Deposited By: | Ariew, Andre |
| Deposited On: | 18 Jun 1998 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2009 19:15 |
Metadata
- ID Plus Text Citation
- RDF+XML
- BibTeX
- Pageflow Montage
- JSON
- Dublin Core
- OAI-ORE Resource Map (Atom Format)
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
- OAI-ORE Resource Map (RDF Format)
- Search Data Dump
- Pageflow
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- YAML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Reference Manager
- RDF+N3
- Eprints Application Profile
Repository Staff Only: item control page

