Cogprints

Skills Training in Laboratory and Clerkship: Connections, Similarities, and Differences

Guldbrand, Dorte and Moercke , M.D, Nielsen, Anne Mette and Wickmann-Hansen , M.Ed, Gitte and Eika , M.D., Ph.D., Berit (2003) Skills Training in Laboratory and Clerkship: Connections, Similarities, and Differences. [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
79Kb

Abstract

Context: During the third semester of a 6 year long curriculum medical students train clinical skills in the skills laboratory (2 hours per week for 9 weeks) as well as in an early, 8 week clinical clerkship at county hospitals. Objectives: to study students’ expectations and attitudes towards skills training in the skills laboratory and clerkship. Subjects: 126 medical students in their 3rd semester. Methods: During the fall of 2001 three consecutive, constructed questionnaires were distributed prior to laboratory training, following laboratory training but prior to clerkships, and following clerkships respectively. Results: Almost all (98%) respondents found that training in skills laboratory improved the outcome of the early clerkship and 70% believed in transferability of skills from the laboratory setting to clerkship. Still, a majority (93%) of students thought that the clerkship provided students with a better opportunity to learn clinical skills when compared to the skills laboratory. Skills training in laboratory as well as in clerkship motivated students for becoming doctors. Teachers in both settings were perceived as being committed to their teaching jobs, to demonstrate skills prior to practice, and to give students feed back with a small but significant more positive rating of the laboratory. Of the 22 skills that students had trained in the laboratory, a majority of students tried out skills associated with physical examination in the clerkship, whereas only a minority of students tried out more intimate skills. Female medical students tried significantly fewer skills during their clerkship compared to male students. Conclusions: Students believe that skills laboratory training prepare them for their subsequent early clerkship but favour the clerkship over the laboratory.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:clinical skills, education, undergraduate, clinical clerkship
Subjects:JOURNALS > Medical Education Online > MEO Peer Reviewed
ID Code:3193
Deposited By:David, Solomon
Deposited On:09 Oct 2003
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Du Boulay C, Medway C. The clinical skills resource: a review of current practice. Med Educ 1999;33:185-91.

2. McManus IC, Richards P, Winder BC, Sproston KA, Vincent CA. The changing clinical experience of British medical students. Lancet. 1993;341:941-4.

3. Remmen R, Scherpier A, Denekens J, Hermann I, Van der Vleuten C, Van Royen P, Bossaert L. Unsatisfactory basic skills performance by students in traditional medical curricula. Med Teacher 1998;20:579-82.

4. Remmen R, Derese A, Scherpbier A, Denekens J, Hermann I, Van der Vleuten C, Van Royen P, Bossaert L. Can medical schools rely on clerkships to train students in basic clinical skills? Med Educ 1999;33:600-5.

5. Bradley P, Bligh J. One year's experience with a clinical skills resource centre. Med Educ 1999;33:114-20.

6. Da Costa PM, Santos J, Maio R, Santos A, Paredes F. The role of a basic surgical skills laboratory as viewed by medical students (6th year). Med Teacher 2001;23:176-80.

7. Ledingham McA, Harden RM. Twelve tips for setting up a clinical skills training facility. Med Teacher 1998;20:503-7.

8. Babbie E: Survey Research Methods 2nd ed. California: Wadsworth Inc., 1998.

9. Hamo IM, Das M, Lanphear J. The Skills Laboratory as Viewed by Medical Students. Annals of Community-Oriented Education 1994;7:309-15.

10. Taylor L, Vergidis D, Lovasik A, Crockford P. A skills programme for preclinical medical students. Med Educ 1992;26:448-53.

11. Treadwell I, Grobler S. Students' perceptions on skills training in simulation. Med Teacher 2001;23:476-82.

12. Moss F, McManus IC. The anxieties of new clinical students. Med Educ 1992;26:17-20.

13. Goldacre M, Stear S, Lambert T. The pre-registration year. The trainees’ experience. Med Educ 1997; 31(suppl. 1):57-60.

14. Patrick J. Training research and practice. London: Academic Press, 1992.

15. Nair BR, Coughlan JL, Hensley MJ. Impediments to bed-side teaching. Med Educ 1998;32:159-62.

16. Van Dalen J, Kerkhofs E, Van Knippenberg, Van den Berg BW, Van den Hout HA, Scherpbier A, Van der Vleuten C. Longitudinal and Concentrated Communication Skills Programmes: Two Dutch Medical Schools compared. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2002;7:29-40.

17. Remmen R, Scherpbier A, Van der Vleuten C, Denekens J, Derese A, Hermann I, Hoogenboom R, Kramer A, Van Rossum H, Van Royen P, Bossaert L. Effectiveness of basic clinical skills training programmes: a cross-sectional comparison of four medical schools. Med Educ 2001;35:121-28.

18. Irby DM, Lippert III FG, Schaad DC. Applied Research. Psychomotor Skills for the General Professional Education of the Physician. Teaching and Learning in Medicine 1991;3:2-5.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page