Chow, Dr. Siu L (2003) Some meta-theoretical issues relating to statistical inference. [Journal (Paginated)]
Full text available as:
| PDF 404Kb |
Abstract
This paper is a reply to some comments made by Green (2002) on Chow’s (2002) critique of Wilkinson and Task Force's (1999) report on statistical inference. Issues raised are (a) the inappropriateness of accepting methodological prescription on authority, (ii) the vacuity of non-falsifiable theories, (iii) the need to distinguish between experiment and metaexperiment, and (iv) the probability foundation of the nullhypothesis significancetest procedure (NHSTP). This reply is intended to foster a better understanding of research methods in general, and of the role of NHSTP in empirical research in particular.
| Item Type: | Journal (Paginated) |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | This is a reply to comments made by Green (2002) on Chow's (2002) critique of Wilkinson and Task Force's (1999) report on statistical inference. |
| Keywords: | Statistical significance, power analysis, effect size, sample size, non-refalsifiable theory |
| Subjects: | Psychology > Clinical Psychology Philosophy > Philosophy of Science |
| ID Code: | 3153 |
| Deposited By: | Chow, Dr. Siu L. |
| Deposited On: | 19 Sep 2003 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2007 17:48 |
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- BibTeX
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Dublin Core
- Reference Manager
- Eprints Application Profile
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
Repository Staff Only: item control page

