Epistemic virtues, metavirtues, and computational complexity

Morton, Professor Adam (2003) Epistemic virtues, metavirtues, and computational complexity. [Preprint]

Full text available as:



I argue that considerations about computational complexity show that all finite agents need characteristics like those that have been called epistemic virtues. The necessity of these virtues follows in part from the nonexistence of shortcuts, or efficient ways of finding shortcuts, to cognitively expensive routines. It follows that agents must possess the capacities – metavirtues –of developing in advance the cognitive virtues they will need when time and memory are at a premium.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:cognition, computational complexity, epistemology, epistemic virtue, metavirtue, virtue
Subjects:Computer Science > Complexity Theory
Philosophy > Philosophy of Mind
Philosophy > Epistemology
ID Code:2886
Deposited By:Morton, Prof Adam
Deposited On:16 Apr 2003
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Baddeley, A.D (1986) Working Memory, Oxford University Press.

Cherniak, Christopher (1986) Minimal Rationality, MIT Press.

Foley, Richard (1993) Working without a net, Oxford University Press.

Gathercole, Susan and Alan Baddeley (1993) Working memory and language, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Goldman Alvin (1992) “Reliablism,” in Jonathan Dancy and Ernest Sosa A Companion to Epistemology, Blackwell.

Goldman Alvin (1999) “Internalism exposed,” Journal of philosophy 6, 1999, pp 271-93.

Greco, John (2001) “Virtues and rules in epistemology,” in Abrol Fairweather and Linda Zagzebski, eds. Virtue epistemology: essays on epistemic virtue and responsibility, Oxford University Press, pp 117-141.

Harman, Gilbert (1986) Change in View, MIT Press.

Harman, Gilbert (1999) Reasoning, meaning, and mind, Oxford University Press.

Hookway, Christopher (1999) “Epistemic norms and theoretical deliberation,” Ratio 12, 1999, pp. 380-398.

Immerman, Neil (1999) Descriptive Complexity, Springer.

Jackson, Frank and Robert Pargetter (1986) “Oughts, Options, and Actualism,” Philosophical Review 95, 1986, pp. 233-255.

Johnson-Laird, Philip (1983) Mental Models, Harvard University Press.

Levi, Isaac (1967) Gambling with Truth, Knopf.

Leake, David B (1998) “Case-based reasoning,” in William Bechtel and George Graham. eds. A companion to cognitive science, Blackwell Publishers.

Lipman, Barton (1991) “How to decide how to decide how to …: Modeling Limited Rationality,” Econometrica, 59, pp. 1105-1125.

Maher, Patrick (1993) Betting on theories, Cambridge University Press.

Millgram, Elijah (1991) “Harman’s hardness arguments,” Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 72, pp 181-202.

Morton, Adam (2002) “Beware stories: emotions and virtues,” in Peter Goldie, ed. Understanding Emotions Ashgate, pp 55-63.

Nussbaum, Martha (1990) Love’s knowledge, Oxford University Press

Papadimitriou, C. (1994) Computational Complexity, Addison-Wesley, 1994

Rubinstein, Ariel (1988) Modelling bounded rationality, MIT Press.

Smith, Holly (1986) “Moral realism, moral conflict and compound acts,” Journal of Philosophy, 83, 1986, pp 341- 360.

Sosa, Ernest (1991) Knowledge in perspective, Cambridge University Press.

Sosa, Ernest (1999) “Skepticism and the internal/external divide,” in The Blackwell guide to epistemology, Blackwell Publishers, pp. 145-157.

Williamson, Timothy (2000) Knowledge and its limits, Oxford University Press

Zagzebski, Linda (1996) Virtues of the mind, Cambridge University Press.

Zimmerman, Michael J. (1996) The structure of moral obligation, Cambridge University Press.


Repository Staff Only: item control page