Dennett, Daniel C. and Kinsbourne, Marcel (1993) Multiple Drafts: An eternal golden braid? [Journal (Paginated)]
| HTML 6Kb |
Abstract
We have learned that the issues we raised are very difficult to think about clearly, and what "works" for one thinker falls flat for another, and leads yet another astray. So it is particularly useful to get these re-expressions of points we have tried to make. Both commentaries help by proposing further details for the Multiple Drafts Model, and asking good questions. They either directly clarify, or force us to clarify, our own account. They also both demonstrate how hard it is for even sympathetic commentators always to avoid the very habits of thought the Multiple Drafts Model was designed to combat. While acknowledging and expanding on their positive contributions, we must sound a few relatively minor alarms.
| Item Type: | Journal (Paginated) |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | Philosophy > Philosophy of Science |
| ID Code: | 274 |
| Deposited By: | Dennett, Daniel |
| Deposited On: | 14 Apr 1998 |
| Last Modified: | 19 Dec 2009 19:15 |
Metadata
- ID Plus Text Citation
- RDF+XML
- BibTeX
- Pageflow Montage
- JSON
- Dublin Core
- OAI-ORE Resource Map (Atom Format)
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
- OAI-ORE Resource Map (RDF Format)
- Search Data Dump
- Pageflow
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- YAML
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Reference Manager
- RDF+N3
- Eprints Application Profile
Repository Staff Only: item control page

