Chow, Siu L. (2002) Methods in Psychological Research.
Full text available as:
| PDF 699Kb |
Abstract
Psychologists collect empirical data with various methods for different reasons. These diverse methods have their strengths as well as weaknesses. Nonetheless, it is possible to rank them in terms of different critieria. For example, the experimental method is used to obtain the least ambiguous conclusion. Hence, it is the best suited to corroborate conceptual, explanatory hypotheses. The interview method, on the other hand, gives the research participants a kind of emphatic experience that may be important to them. It is for the reason the best method to use in a clinical setting. All non-experimental methods owe their origin to the interview method. Quasi-experiments are suited for answering practical questions when ecological validity is importan
| Item Type: | Other |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | causation, control, correlation, deduction, experiment, induction, measurement, non-experiment, quasi-experiment, objectivity, prediction, psychometrics, random sampling distribution, reductionism, research design, regression, relativism, reliability, sampling, statistics, substantive impact, theoretical prescription, validity, variables |
| Subjects: | Psychology > Cognitive Psychology Philosophy > Philosophy of Science |
| ID Code: | 2643 |
| Deposited By: | Chow, Dr. Siu L. |
| Deposited On: | 11 Dec 2002 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2007 17:46 |
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- BibTeX
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Dublin Core
- Reference Manager
- Eprints Application Profile
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
Repository Staff Only: item control page

