Cogprints

On the Impossibility of Successful Ontological Arguments

Franceschi, Paul (2002) On the Impossibility of Successful Ontological Arguments. [Preprint]

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
96Kb

Abstract

This paper presents a novel objection to ontological arguments. This objection aims at showing that ontological arguments in general, given the intrinsic nature of their conclusion, are of an impossible nature. The argument rests on the fact that conclusive ontological arguments would contradict the very nature of God.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:ontological argument
Subjects:Philosophy > Logic
ID Code:2492
Deposited By:Franceschi, Paul
Deposited On:04 Oct 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:55

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

ANSELM, St. Proslogion, in St. Anselm's Proslogion. M. Charlesworth (ed.), Oxford: OUP, 1965

DESCARTES, R. 1642. Meditations on First Philosophy. Translated in J. Cottingham, R. Stoothoff, and D. Murdoch. The Philosophical Writings of Descartes. Vol. 2, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, 1984

KANT, I. 1787. Critique of Pure Reason, second edition. Translated by N. Kemp-Smith. London: Macmillan, 1933

MALCOLM, N. 1960. Anselm's Ontological Arguments. Philosophical Review 69: 41-62

OPPY, G. 1995. Ontological Arguments and Belief in God. New York: Cambridge University Press

OPPY, G. 1996. Ontological Arguments. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, http://www.plato.stanford.edu/entries/ontological-arguments

PLANTINGA, A. 1974. The Nature of Necessity, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page