Cogprints

An Electronic Mail List for a Network of Family Practice Residency Programs: A Good Idea?

Summers Holtrop PhD, CHES, Jodi (2001) An Electronic Mail List for a Network of Family Practice Residency Programs: A Good Idea? [Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]
Preview
PDF
32Kb

Abstract

The use of an electronic mailing list as a means of communication among faculty in a network of university-affiliated family practice residency programs was evaluated. Faculty were automatically subscribed to the list by the list owner. Messages were tracked for one year and a written evaluation survey was sent. Ninety two messages were sent, with 52% of the messages being posted information. While most (65%) survey respondents reported reading 61% or more of the messages, with only 33% ever actually posted at least one message to the list. Given that faculty were automatically subscribed and that there were only 84 total members, the list may have failed to reach a critical mass of active participants. It is concluded that an email list for network faculty did not function as an online discussion group, although it was extremely beneficial as a way of posting information to affiliated residency faculty.

Item Type:Journal (On-line/Unpaginated)
Keywords:computer communication networks, internship and residency, family practice, medical education, health professions education
Subjects:JOURNALS > Medical Education Online > MEO Peer Reviewed
ID Code:2400
Deposited By:David, Solomon
Deposited On:10 Aug 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

1. Goodman K. Electronic roundtables for medical ethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 1992; 2(3):233-251.

2. Rojo A, Ragsdale RG. A process perspective on participation in scholarly electronic forums. Science Communication, 1997;18(4):320-341.

3. Montgomery CH, Keenan P. Facilitating faculty communications using an electronic bulletin board to store and organize listserv messages. Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 1995;83(2):234-237.

4. Carter K. Electronic mailing lists: An instant community. Technology and Learning, 1999; 19(5):52.

5. Ulthman E. To serve of listserv. Stresses from the field. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 1999; 19(2):433-51.

6. Prasad S. Internet mailing lists: A primer. Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh, 2000;45(2):122-6.

7. Goldsborough R. Internet mailing lists offer targeted discussions. Link-Up, 1999;16(3):6.

8. Baldwin FD. "Fam-Med": An internet list for small practices. Pennsylvania Medicine, 1999; November:22-23.

9. Letterie GS, Morgenstern LL, Johnson L. The role of an electronic mail system in the educational strategies of a residency in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1994;84(1):137-139.

10. Mavis BE, Brocato JJ. Virtual discourse: Evaluating DR-ED as a computer mediated communications network for medical education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 1998;19(1):53-65.

11. McLauchlan GJ, Cadogan M, Oliver CW. Assessment of an electronic mailing list for orthopaedic and trauma surgery. The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburg, 1998;44:36-39.

12. Worth ER, Patrick TB. Do electronic mail discussion lists act as virtual colleagues? AMIA, 1997;8280(97):325-329.

13. Gilas T, Schein M, Frykberg E. A surgical Internet discussion list (Surginet): A novel venue for international communication among surgeons. Archives of Surgery, 1998;133(10):1126-30.

14. Thomas RE, James SD. Informal communications networking among health professionals: A study of gp-uk. Health Informatics Journal, 1999;5(2):74-81.

15. Schoch NA. Communication on a listserv for health information professionals: Uses and users of MEDLIB-L.* Bull Med Libr Assoc, 1997;85(1):23-32.

16. Rafaeli S, LaRose RJ. Electronic bulletin boards and "public goods" explanation of collaborative mass media. Communication Research, 1993;20:277-97.

17. Robin BR. The influence of conference moderator strategies on the participation of teachers in collaborative telecomputing projects. Dissertation Abstracts International, 1993; 54(8):2995.

18. Murray PJ. Nurses’ computer-mediated communications on NURSENET: A case study. Computers in Nursing, 1996;14(4):227-234.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page