Cogprints

Departure from the onset-onset rule

Chow, Siu (1994) Departure from the onset-onset rule. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]PDF
471Kb

Abstract

Using a signal-detection task, the generality of Turvey's (1973) onset-onset rule was tested in four experiments. After seeing, in succession, (1) one or two letters (target display), (2) a multiletter detection display, and (3) a mask display, subjects decided whether or not the letter or letters in the target display reappeared in the succeeding detection display at different levels of detection-display duration in various situations. The subjects' sensitivity was inconsistent with the onset-onset rule. More specifically, sensitivity increased with increases in display duration within a fixed stimulus onset asynchrony of 150 msec. Display duration, however, had no effect on response bias. Nor was there any interaction between display duration and display size in terms of either sensitivity or response bias. The more complicated relationship between display duration and display size does not invalidate the departure from the onset-onset rule.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:Stimuous onset asynchrony, SOA, processing time
Subjects:Psychology > Cognitive Psychology
ID Code:2192
Deposited By:Chow, Dr. Siu L.
Deposited On:28 Apr 2002
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

COLTHEART, M. (1980). Iconic memory and visible persistence. Perception & Psychophysics, 27, 183-228.

DE GROOT, A. M. B. (1984). Primed lexical decision: Combined effects of the proportion of related prime-target pairs and the stimulusonset asynchrony of prime and target. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36, 253-280.

ESTES, W. K., & TAYLOR, H. A. (1966). Visual detection in relation to display size and redundancy of critical elements. Perception & Psychophysics, 1, 9-16.

FINLEY, G. (1985a). A high-speed point plotter for vision research. Vision Research, 25, 1993-1997.

FINLEY, G. (1985b). Laboratory functions for the Tecmar Lab Tender and IBM PC. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 17, 397-398.

KAHNEMAN, D. (1968). Method, findings, and theory in studies of visual masking. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 404-425.

KOLERS, P. (1968). Some psychological aspects of pattern recognition. In P. A. Coolers & M. Eden (Eds.), Recognizing patterns (pp. 4-61). Boston: MIT Press.

LOFTUS, G. R., DUNCAN, J., & GEHRIG, E (1992). On the time course of perceptual information that results from brief visual presentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18, 540-549.

McNiCOL, D. (1972). A primer of signal detection theory. London: Allen & Unwin.

MEYER, A. S., & SCHRIEFERS, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1146-1160.

MOLLON, J. D., & POLDEN, P G. (1978). On the time constants of tachistoscopes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 30, 555-568.

RMELHART, D. E. (1970). A multicomponent theory of the perception of briefly exposed visual displays. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 7, 191-218.

SERENO, J. A. (1991). Graphemic, associative, and syntactic priming effects at a brief stimulus onset asynchrony in lexical decision and naming. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 459-477.

TURVEY, M. T. (1973). On peripheral and central processes in vision: Inferences from an information-processing analysis of masking with patterned stimuli. Psychological Review, 80, 1-52.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page