Muter, Paul and Johns, Elizabeth E. (1985) Learning Logographies and Alphabetic Codes. [Journal (Paginated)]
Full text available as:
| HTML 46Kb |
Abstract
In three experiments, literate English-speaking adults learned either to identify or to extract meaning from either logographs (Blissymbols or Chinese characters) or English words written in an unfamiliar alphabetic code. Performance was substantially and reliably better in the logographic conditions than in the alphabetic conditions. Vocabulary sized ranged from 30 to 240 words per condition. In a fourth experiment, learning was slower with inconsistent mapping of graphemes to phonemes (similar to English) than with consistent mapping. These results indicate that, under a reasonably wide range of conditions, logographic writing systems may be easier to learn to read than alphabetic writing systems.
| Item Type: | Journal (Paginated) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | writing systems logographies alphabets learning reading ideographs Bliss Blissymbols Blissymbolics pictographs logographs |
| Subjects: | Psychology > Applied Cognitive Psychology Psychology > Cognitive Psychology Linguistics > Learnability Psychology > Psycholinguistics |
| ID Code: | 1992 |
| Deposited By: | Muter, Prof. Paul |
| Deposited On: | 20 Dec 2001 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Sep 2007 17:42 |
References in Article
Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.
Metadata
- HTML Citation
- ASCII Citation
- EPrints Application Profile (experimental)
- ID Plus Text Citation
- OpenURL ContextObject
- EndNote
- BibTeX
- OpenURL ContextObject in Span
- MODS
- DIDL
- EP3 XML
- Dublin Core
- Reference Manager
- Eprints Application Profile
- Simple Metadata
- Refer
- METS
- Search Data Dump
Repository Staff Only: item control page

