Cogprints

Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: effect of density on female remating frequency

Singh, Shree Ram (2001) Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: effect of density on female remating frequency. [Preprint]

Full text available as:

[img]PDF
65Kb

Abstract

Drosophila ananassae, a cosmopolitan and domestic species, is largely cir-cumtropicalin distribution and belongs to the ananassae species complex of the ananassae subgroup of the melanogaster species group. In the present study, experiments were conducted to investigate the effect of density on fe-male remating frequency by employing different wild-type and mutant strains of D. ananassae. Two experimental designs, i.e., 2-h daily observation and continuous confinement, were used. The results show that there is significant dependence of remating frequency on density in all strains tested under both experimental designs except in a wild-type strain (Bhutan), which shows no dependence of remating frequency on density under 2-h daily observation de-sign. This finding provides evidence that density may increase the frequency of female remating in D. ananassae.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:female remating, Drosophila, density, environmental factors on female remating
Subjects:Biology > Animal Behavior
ID Code:1945
Deposited By:Singh, Shree Ram
Deposited On:01 Dec 2001
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Anderson, W. W. (1974). Frequent multiple insemination in a natural population of Drosophila

pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 108: 709–711.

Aspi, J. (1992). Incidence and adaptive significance of multiple mating in females of two boreal

Drosophila virilis group species. Ann. Zool. Fenn. 29: 147–159.

Aspi, J., and Lankinen, P. (1992). Frequency of multiple insemination in a natural populations

of Drosophila montana. Hereditas 117: 169–177.

Barbadilla, A., Quezada-Diaz, J. E., Ruiz, A., Santos, M., and Barbadilla, A. (1991). The evo-lutionary

history of Drosophila buzzatii. XVII. Double mating and sperm predominance.

Genet. Sel. Evol. 23: 133–140.

Boorman, E., and Parker, G. A. (1976). Sperm (ejaculate) competition in Drosophila

melanogaster, and the reproductive value of females to males in relation to female age

and mating status. Ecol. Entomol. 1: 145–155.

Chapman, T., and Partridge, L. (1996). Female fitness in Drosophila melanogaster: An interaction

between the effect of nutrition and of encounter rate with males. Proc. Roy. Soc. London

Ser. B 263: 755–759.

Chapman, T., Liddle, L. F., Kalb, J. M., Wolfner, M. F., and Partridge, L. (1995). Cost of mating

in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature

373: 241–244.

Chapman, T., Trevitt, S., and Partridge, L. (1996). Remating and male derived nutrients in

Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 51–69.

Chatterjee, S., and Singh, B. N. (1987). Variation in mating behaviour of Beadex mutant and

wild type Drosophila ananassae. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 25: 278–280.

Chatterjee, S., and Singh, B. N. (1988). Effect of light and dark on mating behaviour of red eye

and white eye Drosophila ananassae. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 26: 611–614.

Chen, P. S., Stumm-Zollinger, E., Aigaki, T., Balmer, J., Bienz, M., and Bohen, P. (1988). A

male accessory gland peptide that regulates reproductive behaviour of female Drosophila

melanogaster. Cell 54: 291–298.

Craddock, E. M., and Johnson, W. E. (1978). Multiple insemination in natural populations of

Drosophila silvestris. Dros. Info. Serv. 53: 138–139.

Eckstrand, I. A., and Seiger, M. B. (1975). Population density and mating rates in Drosophila

pseudoobscura. Evolution 29: 287–295.Etges, W. J., and Heed, W. B. (1992). Remating effects on the genetic structure of female life

histories in populations of Drosophila mojavensis. Heredity 68: 515–528.

Gromko, M. H., and Gerhart, P. D. (1984). Increased density does not increase remat-ing

frequency in laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 451–

455.

Gromko, M. H., and Markow, T. A. (1993). Courtship and remating in field populations of

Drosophila. Anim. Behav. 45: 253–262.

Gromko, M. H., Newport, M. E. A., and Kortier, M. G. (1984). Sperm dependence of female

receptivity to remating in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38: 1273–1282.

Harshman, L. G., and Clark, A. G. (1998). Interference of sperm competition from broods of

field-caught Drosophila. Evolution 52: 1334–1341.

Harshman, L. G., Hoffman, A. A., and Prout, T. (1988). Environmental effects on remating in

Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 42: 312–321.

Joly, D., Cariou, M. L., and Lachaise, D. (1991). Can sperm competition explain sperm polymor-phism

in Drosophila teissieri? Evol. Biol. 5: 25–44.

Lefevre, G., and Jonsson, U. B. (1962). Sperm transfer, storage, displacement and utilization in

Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47: 1719–1736.

Lemeunier, F., David, J. R., and Tsacas, L. (1986). The melanogaster species group. In Ashburner,

M., Carson, H. L., and Thompson, J. N. (eds.), The Genetics and Biology of Drosophila,

Academic Press, New York/London, Vol. 3e, pp. 148–256.

Levine, L., Asmussen, M., Olvera, O., Powell, J. R., Delarosa, M. E., Salceda, V. M., Gaso,

M. I., Gujman, J., and Anderson, W. W. (1980). Population genetics of Mexican

Drosophila. V. A high rate of multiple insemination in a natural population of Drosophila

pseudoobscura. Am. Nat. 116: 493–503.

Loukas, M., Vergini, Y., and Krimbas, C. B. (1981). The genetics of Drosophila subobscura pop-ulations.

XVII. Multiple insemination and sperm displacement in Drosophila suboscura.

Genetica 57: 29–37.

Manning, A. (1962). Asperm factor affecting the receptivity of Drosophila melanogaster females.

Nature 194: 252–253.

Markow, T. A. (1985). A comparative investigations of mating system of Drosophila hydei.

Anim. Behav. 33: 775–781.

Markow, T. A., and Ankney, P. F. (1984). Drosophila males contribute to oogenesis in a multiple

mating species. Science 224: 302–303.

Marks, R. W., Seager, R. D., Ayala, F. J., and Barr, L. G. (1988). Local ecology and multiple

matings in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Am. Nat. 131: 918–923.

McRobert, S. P., Adams, C. R., Wutjke, M., Frank, J., and Jackson, L. L. (1997). Acomparison of

female post-copulatory behaviour in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila biarmipes.

J. Insect Behav. 10: 761–770.

Parker, G. A. (1970). Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol.

Rev. 45: 525–567.

Pearl, R. (1932). The influence of density of population upon egg production in Drosophila

melanogaster. J. Exp. Zool. 63: 57–84.

Price, C. S. C. (1997). Conspecific sperm precedence in Drosophila. Nature 388: 663–666.

Pyle, D. W., and Gromko, M. H. (1978). Repeated mating by female Drosophila melanogaster.

The adaptive importance. Experientia 34: 449–450.

Richmond, R. C. (1976). Frequency of multiple insemination in natural populations of

Drosophila. Am. Nat. 110: 485–486.

Richmond, R. C., and Ehrman, L. (1974). The incidence of repeated mating in the superspecies

Drosophila paulistorum. Experientia 30: 489–490.

Sgro, C. M., Chapman, T., and Partridge, L. (1998). Sex-specific selection on time to remate in

Drosophila melanogaster. Anim. Behav. 56: 1267–1278.

Singh, B. N. (1996). Population and behaviour genetics of Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 97:

321–332.

Singh, B. N. (2000). Drosophila ananassae—A species characterised by several unusual genetic

features. Curr. Sci. 78: 391–398.

Singh, B. N., and Chatterjee, S. (1986). Mating ability of homo- and heterokaryotypes of

Drosophila ananassae from natural populations. Heredity 57: 75–78.

Singh, B. N., and Chatterjee, S. (1987). Variation in mating propensity and fertility in isofemale

strains of Drosophila ananassae. Genetica 73: 237–242.

Singh, B. N., and Chatterjee, S. (1988a). Parallelism between male mating propensity and chro-mosome

arrangement frequency in natural populations of Drosophila ananassae. Heredity

60: 269–272.

Singh, B. N., and Chatterjee, S. (1988b). Selection for high and low mating propensity in

Drosophila ananassae. Behav. Genet. 18: 357–369.

Singh, B. N., and Singh, S. R. (1999). Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: Shorter duration

of copulation during second mating as compared to first mating. J. Biosci. 24: 427–431.

Singh, B. N., and Singh, S. R. (2001). Female remating in Drosophila ananassae: Evidence for

sperm displacement and greater productivity after remating. Zool. Sci. 18: 181–185.

Singh, S. R., and Singh, B. N. (1997). Female remating in Drosophila ananassae. Dros. Info. Serv.

80: 38–39.

Singh, S. R., and Singh, B. N. (2000). Male remating in Drosophila ananassae: Evidence for

interstrain variation in remating time and shorter duration of copulation during second

mating. Zool. Sci. 17: 389–393.

Smith, R. L. (1984). Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems, Academic

Press, New York.

Trevitt, S., Fowler, K., and Partridge, L. (1988). An effect of egg deposition on the subsequent

fertility and remating frequency of female Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol. 34:

821–828.

Turner, M. E. (1986). Multiple mating, sperm competition and the fertility component of fitness

in Drosophila pseudoobscura. Fla. Entomol. 69: 121–128.

van Vianen, A., and Bijlsma, R. (1993). The adult component of selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Some aspect of early remating activity in females. Heredity 71: 269–276.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page