Cogprints
Login | Create Account

Kinship and evolved psychological dispositions: The Mother's Brother controversy reconsidered.

Bloch, Maurice and Sperber, Dan (2001) Kinship and evolved psychological dispositions: The Mother's Brother controversy reconsidered. [Preprint]

Warning

There is a more recent version of this eprint available. Click here to view it.

Full text available as:

[img]HTML
82Kb

Abstract

The article revisits the old controversy concerning the relation of the mother's brother and sister's son in patrilineal societies in the light both of anthropological criticisms of the very notion of kinship and of evolutionary and epidemiological approaches to culture. It argues that the ritualized patterns of behavior that had been discussed by Radcliffe-Brown, Goody and others are to be explained in terms of the interaction of a variety of factors, some local and historical, others pertaining to general human dispositions. In particular, an evolved disposition to favor relatives can contribute to the development and stabilization of these behaviors, not by directly generating them, but by making them particularly "catchy" and resilient. In this way, it is possible to recognize both that cultural representations and practices are specific to a community at a time in its history (rather than mere tokens of a general type), and that they are, in essential respects, grounded in the common evolved psychology of human beings.

Item Type:Preprint
Keywords:kinship, jack goody, Radclife-Brown, mother's brother, epidemiology of representations, anthropology, anthropological theory, evolutionary psychology, Richard Alexander, sociobiology
Subjects:Biology > Sociobiology
Psychology > Evolutionary Psychology
ID Code:1885
Deposited By:Sperber, Dan
Deposited On:14 Nov 2001
Last Modified:12 Sep 2007 17:41

Available Versions of this Item

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

ALEXANDER, R. D. 1979. Darwinism and Human Affairs. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

BARNES, J. 1951. Marriage in a Changing Society. Capetown: Oxford University Press. Rhodes-Livingstone Paper 20.

BARTH, F. 1975. Ritual and Knowledge among the Baktaman of New Guinea. New Haven: Yale University Press.

BARTH, F. 1987. Cosmologies in the Making: A Generative Approach to Cultural Variation in New Guinea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BLACKMORE, S. 1999. The Meme Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

BLOCH, M. 1977. The past and the present in the present. Man Vol.12 n.s 279-92.

BLOCH, M.1987. "The Ritual of the Royal Bath in Madagascar: the Dissolution of Death, Birth and Fertility into Authority," in D. Cannadine and S. Price (eds.), Rituals of Royalty: Power and Ceremonial in Traditional Societies, Cambridge:Cambridge University Press

BLOCH, M. 1998. "Commensality and Poisoning" pp.133-151 Special Number Food: Nature and Culture. Social Research Vol 66 No.1

BOON, J.A. 1982. Other tribes, other scribes: Symbolic anthropology in the comparative study of cultures, histories, religion and texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

COLLIER, J. & YANAGISAKO, S. 1987. "Towards a Unified Analysis of Gender and Kinship" in Gender and Kinship. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

DAWKINS, R. 1976. The Selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

EIBL-EIBELSFELD, I. 1975. Ethology, the biology of behavior. NewYork : Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

FORTES, M. 1953. The Structure of Unilineal Descent Groups. American anthropologist 55: 17-41

FORTES, M. 1969. Kinship and the Social Order. Routledge: London.

GEERTZ, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.

GIBSON, T. 1986. Sacrifice and Sharing in the Philippine Highlands. London: Athlone.

GOODY, J. 1959. The Mother's Brother and the Sister's Son in West Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 89:61-88

GLUCKMAN, M. 1954. Rituals of Rebellion in South-East Africa. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

GOUGH,K. 1959. The Nayars and the Definition of Marriage. Journal of the Royal Anthropologcal Institute Vol.89: 23-34.

HAMILTON, W.D. 1964. The Genetical theory of Social Behavior Journal of Theoretical Biology 7:1-52

HIRSCHFELD, L. 1984. Kinship and cognition. Current anthropology 27 (3) 217-242.

JACOB, P. 1997. What Minds Can Do. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

JUNOD, H. 1912. Life of a South African Tribe. Neuchatel, Switzerland: Attinger Bros.

KUPER, A. 1982. Lineage Theory: a critical retrospect Annual Review of Anthropology for 1982 11: 71-95

LEACH, E. 1954. Political Systems of Highland Burma. London:Bell

LEACH, E. 1955. Polyandry, Inheritance and the definition of Marriage In Man 55.

NEEDHAM, R. 1971. "Remarks on the analysis of Kinship and Marriage" in Rethinking Kinship and Marriage. (edited R. Needham) London: Tavistock.

RADCLIFFE-BROWN, A. 1924. The Mother's Brother in South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 21: 542-555

ROSALDO, M. 1980. Knowledge and Passion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SAHLINS, M. 1976. The Use and Abuse of Biology. London: Tavistock.

SCHNEIDER, D. 1984. A Critique of the Study of Kinship. Ann Arbor: The university of Michigan Press.

SHINE, R., ELPHICK, M.J. & HARLOW, P.S. 1995. Sisters like it hot. Nature 378: 451-452.

SPERBER, D. 1985a. On Anthropological Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SPERBER, D. 1985b. Anthropology and psychology: towards an epidemiology of representations (The Malinowski Memorial Lecture (1984). Man (N.S.)20, 73-89.

SPERBER, D. 1996. Explaining Culture: A Naturalistic Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.

STACK, C. 1983. All Our Kin: Startegies for Survival in a Black American Community. New York: Harper Collins.

TOOBY, J. & COSMIDES L. 1992. "The psychological foundations of culture." In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides & J. Tooby (Eds.) The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New-York: Oxford University Press.

TURNER, V. 1969. The Ritual Process. London: Routledge.

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page

Cogprints is powered by EPrints 3 which is developed by the School of Electronics and Computer Science at the University of Southampton. More information and software credits.