Genetic dissection of mouse exploratory behaviour

[1]Alleva, E., Fasolo, A., Lipp, H.P., Nadel, L. and Ricceri, L. (Eds.), NATO ASI Series. Series D, Behavioural and Social Sciences, Vol. 82, Behavioural Brain Research in Naturalistic and Semi-Naturalistic Settings, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1995, 466 pp.

[2]Archer, J., Tests for emotionality in rats and mice: a review, Animal Behaviour, 21 (1973) 205-235.

[3]Barber, R.P., Vaughn, J.E., Wimer, R.E. and Wimer, C.C., Genetically-associated variations in the distribution of dentate granule cell synapses upon the pyramidal cell dendrites in mouse hippocampus, Journal of Comparative Neurology, 156 (1974) 417-34.

[4]Barnett, S.A. and Cowan, P.E., Activity, exploration, curiosity and fear: An ethological study, Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 1 (1976) 43-62.

[5]Blodgett, H.C., The effect of the introduction of reward upon the maze performance of rats, University of California Publications in Psychology, 4 (1929) 113-134.

[6]Broadhurst, P.L. and Jinks, J.L., What genetical architecture can tell us about the natural selection of behavioural traits. In J.H.F. van Abeelen (Ed.), The Genetics of Behaviour, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 43-63.

[7]Crusio, W.E., Quantitative genetics. In D. Goldowitz, D. Wahlsten and R.E. Wimer (Eds.), Techniques for the Genetic Analysis of Brain and Behavior: Focus on the Mouse, Vol. 8, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992, pp. 231-250.

[8]Crusio, W.E., Bi- and multivariate analyses of diallel crosses: a tool for the genetic dissection of neurobehavioral phenotypes, Behavior Genetics, 23 (1993) 59-67.

[9]Crusio, W.E., An introduction to quantitative genetics. In B.C. Jones and P. Mormède (Eds.), Neurobehavioral Genetics: Methods and Applications, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl., 2000, pp. 13-30.

[10]Crusio, W.E., Genthner-Grimm, G. and Schwegler, H., A quantitative-genetic analysis of hippocampal variation in the mouse, Journal of Neurogenetics, 3 (1986) 203-214.

[11]Crusio, W.E. and Schwegler, H., Hippocampal mossy fiber distribution covaries with open-field habituation in the mouse, Behavioural Brain Research, 26 (1987) 153-158.

[12]Crusio, W.E., Schwegler, H. and Brust, I., Covariations between hippocampal mossy fibres and working and reference memory in spatial and non-spatial radial maze tasks in mice, European Journal of Neuroscience, 5 (1993) 1413-1420.

[13]Crusio, W.E., Schwegler, H., Brust, I. and van Abeelen, J.H.F., Genetic selection for novelty-induced rearing behavior in mice produces changes in hippocampal mossy fiber distributions, Journal of Neurogenetics, 5 (1989) 87-93.

[14]Crusio, W.E., Schwegler, H. and Lipp, H.-P., Radial-maze performance and structural variation of the hippocampus in mice: a correlation with mossy fibre distribution, Brain Research, 425 (1987) 182-185.

[15]Crusio, W.E., Schwegler, H. and van Abeelen, J.H.F., Behavioral responses to novelty and structural variation of the hippocampus in mice. I. Quantitative-genetic analysis of behavior in the open-field, Behavioural Brain Research, 32 (1989) 75-80.

[16]Crusio, W.E., Schwegler, H. and van Abeelen, J.H.F., Behavioral responses to novelty and structural variation of the hippocampus in mice. II. Multivariate genetic analysis, Behavioural Brain Research, 32 (1989) 81-88.

[17]Crusio, W.E., Schwegler, H. and van Abeelen, J.H.F., Behavioural and neuroanatomical divergence between two sublines of C57BL/6J inbred mice, Behavioural Brain Research, 42 (1991) 93-97.

[18]Crusio, W.E. and van Abeelen, J.H., The genetic architecture of behavioural responses to novelty in mice, Heredity, 56 (1986) 55-63.

[19]Flint, J., Corley, R., DeFries, J.C., Fulker, D.W., Gray, J.A., Miller, S. and Collins, A.C., A simple genetic basis for a complex psychological trait in laboratory mice, Science, 269 (1995) 1432-1435.

[20]Foshee, D.P., Vierck, C.J., Meier, G.W. and Federspiel, C., Simultaneous measure of general activity and exploratory behavior, Perceptual and Motot Skills, 20 (1965) 445-451.

[21]Gerlai, R., Crusio, W.E. and Csanyi, V., Inheritance of species-specific behaviors in the paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis): a diallel study, Behavior Genetics, 20 (1990) 487-98.

[22]Gray, J.A. and McNaughton, N., Comparison between the behavioural effects of septal and hippocampal lesions: a review, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 7 (1983) 119-188.

[23]Hayman, B.I., The theory and analysis of diallel crosses, Genetics, 39 (1954) 789-809.

[24]Henderson, N.D., Predicting relationships between psychological constructs and genetic characters: an analysis of changing genetic influences on activity in mice, Behavior Genetics, 16 (1986) 201-220.

[25]Jamot, L., Bertholet, J.Y. and Crusio, W.E., Neuroanatomical divergence between two substrains of C57BL/6J inbred mice entails differential radial-maze learning, Brain Research, 644 (1994) 352-356.

[26]Kelley, A.E., Cador, M. and Stinus, L., Exploration and its measurement. A psychopharmacological perspective. In A.B. Boulton, G.B. Baker and A.J. Greenshaw (Eds.), Neuromethods, Volume 13: Psychopharmacology, Humana Press, Clifton, 1989, pp. 95-144.

[27]Moser, E.I., Moser, M.B. and Andersen, P., Potentiation of dentate synapses initiated by exploratory learning in rats: dissociation from brain temperature, motor activity, and arousal, Learning and Memory, 1 (1994) 55-73.

[28]O'Keefe, J. and Nadel, L., The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978, 570 pp.

[29]Renner, M.J., Learning during exploration: The role of behavioral topography during exploration in determining subsequent adaptive behavior, International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2 (1988) 43-56.

[30]Roullet, P. and Lassalle, J.M., Genetic variation, hippocampal mossy fibres distribution, novelty reactions and spatial representation in mice, Behavioural Brain Research, 41 (1990) 61-70.

[31]SAS Institute Inc, SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Edition, Sas Institute Inc., Cary, NC, 1987, 1031 pp.

[32]Schmajuk, N.A., Psychological theories of hippocampal function, Physiological Psychology, 12 (1984) 166-183.

[33]Schwegler, H. and Crusio, W.E., Correlations between radial-maze learning and structural variations of septum and hippocampus in rodents, Behavioural Brain Research, 67 (1995) 29-41.

[34]Takahashi, J.S., Pinto, L.H. and Vitaterna, M.H., Forward and reverse genetic approaches to behavior in the mouse, Science, 264 (1994) 1724-1733.

[35]Talbot, C.J., Nicod, A., Cherny, S.S., Fulker, D.W., Collins, A.C. and Flint, J., High-resolution mapping of quantitative trait loci in outbred mice, Nature Genetics, 21 (1999) 305-308.

[36]van Abeelen, J.H.F., Mouse mutants studied by means of ethological methods. I. Ethogram, Genetica, 34 (1963) 79-94.

[37]van Abeelen, J.H.F., Genetics of rearing behavior in mice, Behavior Genetics, 1 (1970) 71-76.

[38]van Abeelen, J.H.F., Genotype and the cholinergic control of exploratory behaviour in mice. In J.H.F. van Abeelen (Ed.), The Genetics of Behaviour, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1974, pp. 347-374.

[39]van Abeelen, J.H.F., Genetic control of hippocampal cholinergic and dynorphinergic mechanisms regulating novelty-induced exploratory behavior in house mice, Experientia, 45 (1989) 839-845.

[40]Wahlsten, D., Lassalle, J.-M. and Bulman-Fleming, B., Hybrid vigour and maternal environment in mice. III. Hippocampal mossy fibres and behaviour, Behavioural Processes, 23 (1991) 47-57.

[41]Walsh, R.N. and Cummins, R.A., The open-field test: A critical review, Psychological Bulletin, 83 (1976) 482-504.

[42]Weischer, M.L., Eine einfache Versuchsanordnung zur quantitativen Beurteilung von Motilität und Neugierverhalten bei Mäusen, Psychopharmacology, 50 (1976) 275-279.

[43]Whimbey, A.E. and Denenberg, V.H., Two independent behavioral dimensions in open-field performance, Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology, 63 (1967) 500-504.