Change Detection: Paying Attention To Detail Detail

Amirkhiabani, G., & Lovegrove, W.J. (1996). Role of eccentricity and size in the global

precedence effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and

Performance, 22, 1434-1447.

Baylis, G.C. (1994). Visual attention and objects: Two-object cost with equal convexity. Journal

of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 208-212.

Baylis, G.C., & Driver, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effects of

grouping. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.

Boer, L.C., & Keuss, P.J.G. (1982). Global precedence as a postperceptual effect: An analysis of

speed-accuracy tradeoff functions. Perception and Psychophysics, 31, 358-366.

Corbetta, M., Miezin, F.M., Dobmeyer, S., Shulman, G.L. & Petersen, S.E. (1991). Selective and

divided attention during visual discrimination of shape, color, and speed: Functional

anatomy by positron emission tomography. Journal of Neuroscience, 11, 2383-2402.

Coren, S., Ward, L.M., & Enns, J.T. (1999). Sensation & Perception (5th Ed.). New York:

Harcourt Bruce.

Duncan, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of

Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.

Duncan, J. (1993a). Coordination of what and where in visual attention. Perception, 22, 1261-

1270.

Duncan, J. (1993b). Similarity between concurrent visual discriminations: Dimensions and

objects. Perception & Psychophysics, 54, 425-430.

Enns, J.T., & DiLollo (1997). Object substitution: A new form of masking in unattended visual

locations. Psychological Science, 8, 135-139.

Enns, J.T., & Kingstone, A. (1995). Access to global and local properties in visual search for

compound stimuli. Psychological Science, 6, 283-291.

Grice, G.R., Canham, L., & Boroughs, J.M. (1983). Forest before trees? It depends on where you

look. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 121-128.

Grimes, J. (1996). On the failure to detect changes in scenes across saccades. In K. Akins (Ed.).

Perception (pp. 89-110). New York: Oxford University Press.

Hughes, H.C., Layton, W.M., Baird, J.C., & Lester, L.S. (1984). Global precedence in visual

pattern recognition. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 361-371.

Kimchi, R. (1992). Primacy of wholistic processing and global/local paradigm: A critical review.

Psychological Bulletin, 112, 24-38.

Kinchla, R.A., & Wolfe, J.M. (1979). The order of visual processing: "Top-down," "bottom-up,"

or "middle-out". Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 225-231.

Kingstone, A.F. (1992). Combining expectancies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental

Psychology, 44A, 69-104.

Lamb, M.R. (1999). Spatial frequency affects search slope but not attentional selection with

hierarchically organized stimuli. Abstracts of the Psychonomic Society, 4, 424.

Lamb, M.R., & Robertson, L.C. (1989). Do response time advantage and interference reflect the

order of processing of global- and local-level information? Perception & Psychophysics,

46, 254-258.

Levin, D.T., & Simons, D.J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion

pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 4, 501-506.

Martin (1979). Local and global processing: The role of sparsity. Memory & Cognition, 7, 476-

484.

McConkie, G.W., & Currie, C.B. (1996). Visual stability across saccades while viewing complex

pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22,

563-581.

Miller, J. (1981). Global precedence in attention and decision. Journal of Experimental

Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 1161-1174.

Nakayama, K. (1990). The iconic bottleneck and the tenuous link between early visual

processing and perception. In C. Blakemore (Ed.), Vision: Coding and efficiency (pp. 411-

422). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception.

Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353-383.

Navon, D., & Norman, J. (1983). Does global precedence really depend on visual angle? Journal

of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 955-965.

O'Regan, J.K. (1992). Solving the "real" mysteries of visual perception: The world as an outside

memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 46, 461-488.

Rensink, R. A. (2000). Visual search for change: A probe into the nature of attentional

processing. Visual Cognition, 7, 345-376.

Rensink, R.A., O'Regan, J.K., & Clark, J.J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to

perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.

Robertson, L.C., Egly, R., Lamb, M.R., & Kerth, L. (1993). Spatial attention and cuing to global

and local levels of hierarchical structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human

Perception and Performance, 19, 471-487.

Scholl, B.J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker

paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7, 377-396.

Simons, D.J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological

Science, 7, 301-305.

Simons, D.J., & Levin, D.T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world

interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.

Smilek, D., Eastwood, J. D., & Merikle, P. M. (in press). Does unattended information facilitate

change detection? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and

Performance.

Ward, L.M. (1982). Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms.

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 562-581.

Ward, L.M. (1983). On processing dominance: Comment on Pomerantz. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 112, 541-546.