Cogprints

The Hubble Hypothesis and the Developmentalist's Dilemma

Richters, John E. (1997) The Hubble Hypothesis and the Developmentalist's Dilemma. [Journal (Paginated)]

Full text available as:

[img]PDF
327Kb

Abstract

Developmental psychopathology stands poised at the close of the 20th century on the horns of a major scientific dilemma. The essence of this dilemma lies in the contrast between its heuristically rich open system concepts on the one hand, and the closed system paradigm it adopted from mainstream psychology for investigating those models on the other. Many of the research methods, assessment strategies, and data analytic models of psychology’s paradigm are predicated on closed system assumptions and explanatory models. Thus, they are fundamentally inadequate forstudying humans, who are unparalleled among open systems in their wide ranging capacities for equifinal and multifinal functioning. Developmental psychopathology faces two challenges in successfully negotiating the developmentalist’s dilemma. The first lies in recognizing how the current paradigm encourages research practices that are antithetical to developmental principles, yet continue to flourish. I argue that the developmentalist’s dilemma is sustained by long standing, mutually enabling weaknesses in the paradigm’s discovery methods and scientific standards. These interdependent weaknesses function like a distorted lens on the research process by variously sustaining the illusion of theoretical progress, obscuring the need for fundamental reforms, and both constraining and misguiding reform efforts. An understanding of how these influences arise and take their toll provides a foundation and rationale for engaging the second challenge. The essence of this challenge will be finding ways to resolve the developmentalist’s dilemma outside the constraints of the existing paradigm by developing indigenous research strategies, methods, and standards with fidelity to the complexity of developmental phenomena.

Item Type:Journal (Paginated)
Keywords:paradigm, research methods, statistical significance, causal reasoning,
Subjects:Psychology > Developmental Psychology
ID Code:1009
Deposited By:Richters, John
Deposited On:14 Oct 2000
Last Modified:11 Mar 2011 08:54

References in Article

Select the SEEK icon to attempt to find the referenced article. If it does not appear to be in cogprints you will be forwarded to the paracite service. Poorly formated references will probably not work.

Allport. G. W. (1960). The open system in personality

theory. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,

61. 301-310.

Altman, I., & Rogoff, B. (1987). World views in psychol-l

ogy: Trait, interactional, organismic, and transactional

perspectives. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Hand-book

of environmen!al psychology (pp. 740). NewYork: Wiley.

American Psychological Association. (1974). Publication

manual of the American Psychological Association

(2nd ed.). Baltimore: Garamond/Pridemark Press.

Anastasi, A. (1958). Differential psychology (3rd ed.).

New York: Macmillan.

Bakan, D. (1966). The test of significance in psychologi-cal

research. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 423-437.

Baldwin, J. M. (1895). Mental development of the child

and the race: Methods and processes. New York:

Macmillan.

Beach, F. A., & Jaynes (1956). Studies of maternal re-trieving

in rats, III: Sensory cues involved in the lac-tating

female’s response to her young. Behaviour, 10,

104-125.

Bergman, L. R., & Magnusson, D. (in press). A person-oriented

approach in research on developmental psy-chopathology.

Development and Psychopathology.

Bevan, W. (1991). Contemporary psychology: A tour in-side

the onion, American Psychologist, 46, 475-483.

Bevan, W., & Kessel, F. (1994). Plain truths and home

cooking: Thoughts on the making and remaking of

psychology. American Psychologist, 49, 505-509.

Bhatara, V. S., McMillin, .I M., & Krummer, M. (1995).

Aggressive behavior and fire-setting in a 4-year-old

boy associated with ingestion of ground beef contami-nated

with bovine thyroid tissue: A case report and

review of neuropsychiatric thyrotoxicosis. Journal of

Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology 5, 255-

271.

Brandt, L. W. (1973). The physics of the physicist and

the physics of the psychologist. International Journal

of Psychology, 8, 61-72.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human devel-opment:

Experiments by nature and design. Cam-bridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

Cairns, R. B. 1986). Phenomena lost: Issues in the study

of development. In .I. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual

subject and scientific psychology (p p. 97-l12). New

York: Plenum Press.

Cicchetti, D. (1984). The emergence of developmental

psychopathology. Child Development, 55, 1-7.

Cicchetti, D. (1990). A historical perspective on the disci-pline

of developmental psychopathology. In J. Rolf,

A. Masten, D. Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, & S. Wein-traub

(Eds.), Risk and protective factors in the devel-opment

of psychopathology (pp. 2-28). New York:

Cambridge University Press.

Cicchetti, D. (1993). Developmental psychopathology:

Reactions, reflections, and projections. Develop-

Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L.,

Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of

churzce: HOW probability changed science and every-day

life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glymour, C. (1980). Hypothetico-deductivism is hope-less.

Philosophy of Science, 47, 322-325 .

Gould, S. J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homol-ogy,

or why history matters. American Scientist, 74,

60-69.

Gould, S. J. (1987). Darwinism defined: Sifting fact from

mental Review, 13, 471-502. theory. Discover, 8, 64-70.

Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Ed%). (1995a). Develop-mermd

psychopathology: Vol. 1. Theory and methods.

New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cicchetti, D., & Cohen, D. J. (Eds). (1995b). Develop-mental

psychopathology: Vol. 2. Risk, disorder, und

adaptation. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Cicchetti, D., & Richters, J. E. (1993). Developmental

psychopathology considerations in the study conduct

disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 33 I-344.

Cicchetti, D., & Rogosch, F. A. (1996). Equifinality and

multifinality in developmental psychopathology. De-velopment

and Psychopathology, 8, 597-600.

Cohen, J. (1990). Things I have learned so far. American

Psychologist, 45, 1304-I 3 12.

Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p < .05). American

Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.

Cronbach, L. J. (1957). The two disciplines of scientific

psychology. American Psychologist, 12, 671-684.

Edwards, W. (1965). A tactical note on the relation be-tween

scientific and statistical hypotheses. Psycholog-ical

Bulletin, 63, 400-402.

Elasser, W. M. (1966). Atom and organism A new ap-proach

to theoretical biology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton

University Press.

Elasser, W. M. (1981). Principles of a new biological the-ory:

A summary. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 89,

131-150.

Emde, R. N. (1994). Individuality, context, and the search

for meaning. Child Development, 65, 719-737.

Estes, W. K. (in press). Significance testing in psycholog-ical

research: Some persisting issues. Psychological

Science.

Evans, C., & McConnell, T. R. (1941). A new measure

of introversion-extroversion. Journal of Psychology,

12, 111-124.

Ferguson, L. (1959). Statistical analysis in psychology

and education. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Feynman, R. (1986). Surely you’re joking, Mr. Feynman!

New York: Bantam Books.

Fox, R. E. (1996). Charlatanism, scientism, and psycholo-gy’s

social contract. American Psychologist, 51, 777-

784.

Gerstein, D. R., Luce, R. D., Smelser. N. J., & Sperlich,

S. (1988). The behavioral and social sciences:

Achievements and opportunities. Washington, DC:

National Academy Press.Gigerenzer, G., Swijtink, Z., Porter, T., Daston, L.,

Beatty, J., & Kruger, L. (1989). The empire of

churzce: HOW probability changed science and every-day

life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Glymour, C. (1980). Hypothetico-deductivism is hope-less.

Philosophy of Science, 47, 322-325 .

Gould, S. J. (1986). Evolution and the triumph of homol-ogy,

or why history matters. American Scientist, 74,

60-69.

Gould, S. J. (1987). Darwinism defined: Sifting fact from

theory. Discover, 8, 64-70.Guilford, J. P. (1942). Fundamental statistics in psychol- Loftus, G. R. (1991). On the tyranny of hypothesis testing

ogy and education (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw- in the social sciences. Contemporary Psychology, 36,

Hill. 102-105.

Herrenkohl, L. R., & Rosenberg, P. A. (1972). Exterocep-tive

stimulation of maternal behavior in the naive rat.

Physiology & Behavior, 8, 595-598.

Hinde, R. A. (1992). Developmental psychology in the

context of other behavioral sciences. Developmental

Psychology, 28, 1018-1029.

Loftus, G. R. (1993). Editorial comment. Memory & Cog-nition,

21, 1-3.

Hinde, R. A., & Dennis, A. (1986). Categorizing individ-uals:

An alternative to linear analysis. International

Journal Behavioral Development, 9, 105-l19.

Horgan, J. (1996). Why Freud isn’t dead. American Sci-entist,

December, 106-l11.

Institute of Medicine. (1989). Research on children and

adolescents with mental, behavioral, and develop-mental

disorders. Washington, DC: National Acad-emy

Press.

Kagan, J. (1992). Yesterday’s premises, tomorrow’s

promises. Developmental Psychology, 28, 990-997.

Kagan, J.. Kearsley, R. B., & Zelazo, P. R. (1978). In-fancy:

Its place in haman development. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

Kaplan, H. B. (1996). Toward an understanding of resil-ience:

A critical review of definitions and models. In

M. D. Glantz, J. Johnson, & L. Huffman (Eds.), Resil-iency

and development: Positive life adaptations.

New York: Plenum Press.

Kavale, K. A., & Fomess, S. R. (1987). The far side of

heterogeneity: A critical analysis of empirical subtyp-ing

research in learning disabilities. Journal of Learn-ing

Disabilities, 20, 374-382.

Koch, S. (1959). Psychology: A study of science (Vol. 3).

New York: McGraw-Hill.

Lykken, D. T. (1968). Statistical significance in psycho-logical

research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151-159.

Lykken, D. T. (1991). What’s wrong with psychology

anyway? In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.),

Thinking clearly about psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 3-39).

Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Mackie, J. L. (1974). The cement of the universe: A study

of causation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Magnusson, D. (1985). Implications of an interaction-al

paradigm for research on human development. In-temational

Journal of Behavioral Development, 8,

115-137.

Magnusson, D., & Allen, V. L. (1983). Implications and

applications of an interactional perspective for human

development. In D. Magnusson & V. L. Allen (Eds.),

Human development: An interactional perspective

(pp. 369-387). New York: Academic Press.

Magnusson, D., & Bergman, L. (1988). Individual and

variable-based approaches to longitudinal research on

early risk factors. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Studies of psy-chosocial

risk: The power of longitudinal data (pp.

45-61). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Maltz, M. D. (1994). Deviating from the mean: The de-clining

significance of significance. Journal of Re-search

in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 434-436.

Maton, K. I. (1993). A bridge between cultures: Linked

ethnographic empirical methodology for culture-an-chored

research. American Journal of Community

Psychology, 21, 701-121.

Koch, S. (1961). Psychological science versus the science-humanism

antinomy: Intimations of a significant sci-ence

of man. American Psychologist, 16, 629-639.

Koch, S., & Leary, D. E. (Eds.). (1992). A century of

psychology as science. Washington, DC: American

Psychological Association Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1957). The Copernican revolution. Chicago:

University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions

(2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kuhn, T. S. (1977). The essential tension. Chicago: Uni-versity

of Chicago Press.

McCord, J. (1993). Descriptions and predictions: Three

problems for the future of criminological research.

Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30,

412425.

McGuire, W. J. (1983). A contextualist theory of knowl-edge:

Its implications for innovation and reform in

psychological research. Advances in Experimental .So

cial Psychology, 16, 241.

Lakatos, I. (1977). The methodology of scientific research

programmes :Philosophical papers (Vol. I). J. Wor-ral

& E. G. Zahar (Eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni-versity

Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1954). Clinical versus statistical prediction:

A theoretical analysis and review of the evidence.

Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1967). Theory testing in psychology and

physics: A methodological paradox. Philosophy of

Science, 34, 103-I 15.

Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and its problems: Toward a

theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of

California at Berkeley.

Leahey, T. H. (1987). A history of psychology: Main car-rents

in psychological thought (2nd ed.). New York:

Prentice-Hall.

Meehl, P. E. (1973). Psychodiagnosis: Selected papers.

Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1978). Theoretical risks and tabular aster-isks:

Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of

soft psychology. Journal of Consulting and Clinical

Psychology, 46, l-42.

Lerner, R. M., & Kaufman, M. B. (1985). The concept

of development in contextualism. Developmental Re-view,

5, 309-333.

Leventhal, L. (1992). Nudging aside Meehl’s paradox.

Canadian Psychology, 35, 283-298.

Lewin, K. (1931a). The conflict between Aristotelian and

Galilean models of thought in contemporary psychol-ogy.

Journal of General Psychology, 5, 147-117.

Lewin, K. (1931b). Environmental forces in child behav-ior

and development. In C. Murchison (Ed.), A hand-book

of child psychology (2nd ed., pp. 590-625).

Worster, MA: Clark University Press.

Meehl, P. E. (1990). Appraising and amending theories:

The strategy of Lakatosian defense and two principles

that warrant it. Psychological Inquiry. I, 108-141.

Mitroff, I., & Featheringham, T. (1974). On systematic

problem solving and the error of the third kind. Be-havioral

Science, 19, 383-393.

Morrison, D. E.. & Henkel. R. E. (Eds.). (1970). The sig-nificance

test controversy. Chicago: Aldine.

Nagel, E. (1961). The structure of science. New York:

Harcourt, Brace. and World.

National Advisory Mental Health Council. (1990). Na-tional

Plan for Research on Child and Adolescent

Mental Disorders. Rockville, MD: National Institute

of Mental Health.

New York Times. (1990, July 1). Calamities in space. Sec-tion

1. Editorial desk, p. 16.

Nunnally, J. C. (1975). Introduction to statistics in psy-chology

and education. New York: McCraw~Hill.

Overton. W. F. (1984a). World views and their influence

on psychological theory and research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Laudan.

In H. W. Reese (Ed.), Advances in child

Development and behavior (Vol. 18, pp. 19 l-225). New

York: Academic Press.

Overton, W. F. (1984b). Comments on Beilin’s epistemol-ogy

and Palermo’s defense of Kuhn. In H. W. Reese

(Ed.). Advances in child development and behavior

(Vol. 18, pp. 273-276) . New York: Academic Press.

Overton, W. F., & Horowitz, H. A. (1991). Develop-mental

psychopathology: Integrations and integra-tions.

In D. Cicchetti & S. Toth (Eds.), Rochester

Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology: Vol.

3. Models and integrations (pp. 142). Rochester,

NY: University of Rochester Press.

Pepper, S. C. (1942). World hypotheses. Berkeley: Uni-versity

of California.

Platt, J. R. (1964). Strong inference: Certain systematic

methods of scientific thinking may produce much more

rapid progress than others. Science, 146, 347-362.

Popper, K. R. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery.

London: Hutchinson.

Popper, K. R. (1991). Of clouds and clocks: An approach

to the problem of rationality and the freedom of man.

In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Eds.), Thinking

clearly about psychology.(Vol. 1, pp. 100-l39). Min-neapolis,

MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Radke-Yarrow, M., & Sherman, T. (1990). Hard grow-ing:

Children who survive. In J. Rolf, A. Masten, D.

Cicchetti, K. Nuechterlein, & S. Weintraub (Eds.),

Risk and protective factors in the development of psy-chopathology

(pp. 97-l19). New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction. Chi-cago:

University of Chicago.

Richters, J. E. (1996). Disordered views of antisocial

children: A late 20th century perspective. In C. Ferris

(Ed.), Understanding aggressive behavior in children.

New York: New York Academy of Sciences.

Richters, J. E.. & Cicchetti, D. (1993a). Editorial: Toward

a developmental perspective on conduct disorder. De-velopment

and Psvchopathology, 5, 1-4.

Richters, J. E., & Cicchetti, D. (1993b). Mark Twain

meets DSM-III-R: Conduct disorder, development.

and the concept of harmful dysfunction. Development

and Psychopathology, 5, 5-29.

Robinson, D. N. (1984). The new philosophy of science:

A reply to Manicas and Secord. American Psyholo-gist,

39, 920-921.

Rorer, L. G. (1991). Some myths of science in psychol-ogy.

In D. Cicchetti & W. M. Grove (Ed.). Thinking

clearly about psychology (Vol. 1. pp. 61-87). Minne-apolis,

MN: University of Minnesota Press.

Rozeboom, W. W. (1982). Let’s dump hypothctico-de-ductivism

for the right reasons. Philosophy of Sci-ence,

49, 637-647.

Russell, J. (1990). Causal explanations in cognitive de-velopment.

In G. Butterworth & P. Bryant (Eds.),

Causes of development: Interdisciplinary perspectives

(pp. 111-134). London: Harvester, Wheatsheaf

Hemel Hemstead.

Rutter, M., & Garmery. N. (1983). Developmental psy-chopathology.

In E. M. Hetherington (Ed.), Carmi-chaels

manual of child psychology: Vol. 4. Social

and personality development (pp. 775-911). New

York: Wiley.

Salmon, W. C. (1984). Scientific explanation and the

causal Structure of the world. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Sameroff, A. (1995). Developmental systems: Contexts

and evolution. In D. Cicchetti & D. Cohen (Eds.), De-velopmental

psychopathology: Risk, disorder and ad-uptation

(pp. 238-294). New York: Wiley-Intersci-encc.

Sameroff, A. J., & Chandler, M. J. (1975). Reproductive

risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F.

D. Horowitz. M. Hetherington, S. Starr-Salapatek, &

G. Siegel (Eds.), Review of child development re-search

(pp. 187-244). Chicago: University of Chi-cago

Press.

Sarason, S. B. (1981). Psychology misdirected. New

York: The Free Press.

Shadish, W. R. (1995). Philosophy of science and the

quantitative-qualitative debates: Thirteen common er-rors.

Education and Program Planning, I8, 63-75.

Shames, M. L. (1990). On data, methods, and theory: An

epistemological evaluation of psychology. Canadian

Psychology, 31, 229-238.

Smith. P. M., & Torrey. B. B. (1996). The future of the

behavioral and social sciences. Science, 271, 61, 1-612.

Spemann. H. (1938). Embryonic development and induc-tion.

New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Sroufe. L. A., & Rutter, M. (1984). The domain of devel-opmental

psychopathology. Child Development, 83,

173-189.

Thurstone. L. L. (1938). Primary mental abilities. Chi-cago:

University of Chicago Press.

Valsiner. J. (Ed.). (1986a). The individual subject and sci-entific psychology. New York: Plenum Press.

Valsiner. J. (1986b). Between groups and individuals:

Psychologists’ and laypersons’ interpretations of cor-relational

findings. In J. Valsiner (Ed.), The individual

Subject and scientific psychology (pp. 113-l52). New

York: Plenum Press.

von Bertalanffy. L. (1968). General system theory. New

York: George Braziller. Inc.

Waddington. C. H. (1957). The strategy of genes . Lon-don:

Allen & Unwin.I

Metadata

Repository Staff Only: item control page